19 May
2009
19 May
'09
10:57 a.m.
Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Stéphane Letz <letz(a)grame.fr> writes:
You will be isolating a whole lot of existing users by forcing a new
paradigm on them before they are ready. Just look at Facebook for a good
example of how this doesn't work.
I think jack devs have to put the effort into making the transition to a
more flexible system as subtle as possible rather than smacking people
round the head with it.
First we have to get a consensus on this
"runtime choice of auto-start
strategy", then we'll have to find the best way to implement it.
I was against mixed jack1/jack2 and i'm against the runtime choice
now. IMHO it complicates things for user instead of simplifying it.
It also complicates codebase and I think we can spend our efforts with
something else instead. Still, if someone has the motivation to do
runtime choice of auto-strategy - fine, i can live with it. The only
important thing is that with jackdbus the default strategy must be
autostarting through dbus. If it is not, by default jackdbus control apps
will not work with jackdbus. Such setup will be pretty useless, eh?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Jack-Devel mailing list
Jack-Devel(a)lists.jackaudio.org
http://lists.jackaudio.org/listinfo.cgi/jack-devel-jackaudio.org