22 Nov
2012
22 Nov
'12
10:57 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:16:57AM +0530, Prasant J wrote:
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Egor Sanin
<egor.sanin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Ecasound is popular, mature, robust, versatile, low level.
Nama adds typical DAW abstractions
(projects/tracks/buses/inserts), some algorithms for
generating Ecasound signal processing networks, and its own
command language. The core features are stable fairly
well exercised. Nama deals with .WAV files, so you
would handle mp3 conversion in a separate step.
Hope this helps.
Joel
Assuming it's underpowered and headless, you can take a look at ecasound:
http://ecasound.seul.org/ecasound/
Clean API and lot's of language bindings to interact with it.
But you should first look at Nama, because it may be exactly what you
intend to develop:
http://freeshell.de/~bolangi/cgi1/nama.cgi/00home.html
@Egor: bang on! I will read more about ecasound & nama. Thanks a lot
for pointing out that to me.
Can I assume that both are popular, stable & actively developed? -Prasant
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
--
Joel Roth