1 Oct
2014
1 Oct
'14
3:01 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 01.10.2014 12:03, Harry van Haaren wrote:
Flo wrote:
Thats's cool. I actually prematurely stopped my point there. I was
gonna say that my idealism doesn't extend to providing non-enthusiasts
tools that they can use. And I'm pretty sure many other enthusiasts
and tinkerers share that point.
I was also gonna say that if people like polished closed software on
closed systems better than open source stuff, that's fine, too.
The important point was though that left to their own devices the
non-enthusiasts will be slaughtered by the software they use and maybe
we have a responsibility to protect them from themselves.
But then: Where's the resources for doing that work coming from?
Flo
I'm an enthusiast and I don't need shiny
tools and integration. I
need well designed (software design, separation of concern,
multiple ways of interfacing, language bindings, etc.) building
blocks to tinker and experiment with.
And I understand that there is a need for
software to cater for
your use case, or preferred workflow too. That's the lower-left
quadrant in the talk: "Open Features-driven" tools. Very powerful
when in very capable hands.
Its users who would prefer a smooth experience that do not have
software available to them on linux audio right now. And its
designing and building software in that domain that I'm interested
in (both as "me", and OpenAV). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUK/s6AAoJEA5f4Coltk8ZAwcH/jB3kGFYBwqQwbUHg49eZuvD
j+31I5+oiozipL9umw0Gr/D0JyHDeAc998UAJlRUFKkcL95nsCBpnU4AQrllK4Rd
o+H3Hla+aCT8AX0px5rrA6CCao9X0YgljpxvFhYdNMFL9C1rDulzJPOOW051rqPX
wIjay4uknn+v9+my7iiFJyZBVCrRz2McmMPQ8AalBsln7hNQ1ieHuzEehpqP8CPy
ERmInVhCrxmYRj26eGAzUYF5x1MgkgJUePdEuY7F8PHGLhQTH7Gbtl0xtNQqA0Wh
3XAa7fiE9zPL1NMAYj12NU9HvThOw+K0y9aCrxcbvyrDYKFkWWkzA+u/VZmuR1w=
=bsn5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----