Re: [LAD] Interoperability between session management systems

On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:47:26 -0500 Paul Davis <paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote: You and David do not understand what I'm proposing. My intention is not to create a new protocol. Creating another system because there are already too many would be indeed idiotic: that's what has been done before with the other session managers. I imagine creating *something* that makes the existing systems work together, *without* changing the clients that use the existing systems. I.e. one app may be thinking it's talking to non-session, one app speaks ladish, another thinks it's talking to jack-session, but in reality they all talk to one session manager which implements all 3 (4... 7... umpteen) protocols. I have not looked at the implementations of the existing systems. Maybe what I'm proposing is not easily possible. In any case, I want you to understand that I'm not proposing to increase the number of systems in order to decrease the number of systems. That would be, indeed, dumb in a painfully obvious way.