24 Nov
2009
24 Nov
'09
11:53 a.m.
Karl Hammar wrote:
What is wrong with netjack? It's made for point-to-point and very
simple. You just have to solve the clock issue unless you want to lose
bit transparency.
Flo
--
Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
public key DA43FEF4 x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
[RockNet,
Roland Digital Snake, Ethersound]
Yes, but the devil is in the
details as always. Having a working
example is as usual an working example. And we are missing an open
protocol for this. That tells us that it should be doable. But of
cause we want an open
protocol. Do you know the capacity limits of those systems?
Approximately what you
could expect from a 100MBit/s link. At least 32
channels, rocknet even more, but they use 400MBit/s.