29 Jan
2008
29 Jan
'08
10 a.m.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:31 -0500
Dave Robillard <dave(a)drobilla.net> wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian
Schoenebeck wrote:
did you just presume to speak for virtually
everybody?
So get it: there is NOT only one definition
of the term "open source" when standing
alone. Like with many unspecific short terms,
different people have different opinions of
those short terms.
Yours just coincidentally is shared by
virtually nobody and it just so happens that
this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your
software which you wish to call 'open source'
for PR reasons.
virtually nobody cares what you think.
how's that?
cheers,
pete.