30 Apr
2004
30 Apr
'04
2:37 p.m.
[Jens M Andreasen]
On tor, 2004-04-29 at 16:11, Chris Cannam wrote:
as i understand it, this is not enough. the run_synth() method allows
you to run the synth for a continuous audio block with [MIDI] events
interspersed at arbitrary timestamps, while with midi_msg() you'd
have to split audio blocks to match event timestamps, which is messy
and performance-unfriendly.
tim
On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 2:19 pm, Jens M Andreasen
wrote:
Mmm .. This would replace, I think, all of your considerations on how to
extend LADSPA. It is (probably?) the only extension really needed. MIDI
is a very powerful protocol, and the beuty is that the client needs only
to implement those parts it needs to get going. I think I will not be really, totally happy
before I see something
like:
void (*midi_msg)(LADSPA_Handle instance,
unsigned byte msg[4]);
This would be exactly equivalent to the existing run_synth(), would it
not?