12 Apr
2004
12 Apr
'04
6:03 p.m.
On mån, 2004-04-12 at 12:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
I deliberatedly "compacted" away GNU, because .. ehrmm ..
To me GNU is not so very important. If it is to you, I will of course
respect that. It is a non problem.
We are watching "Lilja Forever" on telly at the moment, but I will come
back to you a little later tonight ...
/jens
Jens M. Andreasen writes:
-<snip>-
compacted:
-<snipped as well>- FWIW, I hate to think that the lack of a good
suggestion is the
bottleneck (if so, I should have made a better one long ago). Maybe I
don't understand; do you also do content management for the
linux-sound.org site?
No, I am not an editor for any site.
My humble suggestistion (for a release note) still lacks what I called
for in the first place:
What is new and important? Bugfixes? Features? The "catchline" so
to say, the line telling people that it might be worthwhile to update
their system.
What I did with your _summary_ of the project was an attempt to get a
better "flow" and perhaps adding a few keywords like "graphical" for
an
unsuspecting audience. I am still not satisfied with what I wrote. It
lacks a sentence near the top indicating "custumor satisfaction"
combined with "developer dedication (for perfection?)"
The LilyPond
score engine
Please do not `compact' GNU away, esp. as the linux-sound.org page
also lists shareware (and currently more favourable at that than
LilyPond, btw.).
Jan.
/jens