Le 29 janv. 08 à 06:11, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit :
Stéphane Letz <letz(a)grame.fr> writes:
Could JackEngine here be renamed
"JackServer"? I think It would
correspond more to what "engine" and "server" are internally.
Now that we are on this, please tell me what "server" and "engine"
are
internally, from your point of view. I dont care that much about
actual
naming as long as it is commonly accepted. For example I can recall
some
ppl calling jackd process the "server".
Speaking for jackdmp:
- JackEngine keep the list of clients (internal in the server and
"external/proxy" ones)
- JackServer keeps a JackEngine object, the currently used audio
driver, the "freewheel" driver... It is the "global" object in the
server process, that allocates and keeps every more internal objects.
Then why
not translate that in a pure C API, something like:
I'll translate it once we agree on the API model (including naming).
And
I'll at least implement the API for the trunk jack codebase.
OK
Stephane