29 Jan
2008
29 Jan
'08
8:44 a.m.
Hehe, succinctly put Christian.
Just doing a quick count of all the lines that have been written about this,
and the sometime belligerent enthusiasm attacking LS and questioning their
integrity because they're perceived as not being 'pure' by interpretation,
by some of you, and just since i've been here, there seems to be a lot of
code, sorry i mean text, written.
Makes me wonder just what the incentive is, to batter this to death over and
over again, instead of being admired for the quality and skill of coding
most of you have already proved you are capable of.
To offer a counterweight to this, have all you craftsmen considered getting
together in a concentrated team effort, free of politics, and indulge in an
intense push to expand Jack and Jackdmp (for example) to incorporate kernel
level audio, with modules, and do away with alsa altogether? Now that WOULD
be something to talk about, and a wonderful incentive for developers to come
together as one, with a common goal for the greater good. Jack is already
'king of the empire', in my humble opinion, and would expand it's grip on
the planet even further with this final step towards ONE complete linux
audio and midi solution.
I live in hope that you chaps will take a deep breath, and use those
obviously competent typing skills you're exercising at the moment, in
writing more excellent code that i can use, and continue to admire and
respect you for.
Alex.
On Jan 29, 2008 1:42 PM, Christian Schoenebeck <cuse(a)users.sourceforge.net>
wrote:
Am Dienstag, 29. Januar 2008 06:25:31 schrieben Sie:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 03:16 +0000, Christian
Schoenebeck wrote:
Right, just by the majority of e.g. all Windows and OS X users, hmm who
reflect the majority of all users anyway. And right, I forgot I'm
promoting a
product. Thanks Dave for enlighten us about the truth! Now I clearly see
there is only white and nothing else than white! Well, maybe black, but
the
black ones are evil by definition and don't count.
Thanks my Pope! How could I ever have doubts in your holy inerrable words.
CU
Christian
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
So get it: there is NOT only one definition of
the term "open source"
when standing alone. Like with many unspecific short terms, different
people have different opinions of those short terms.
Yours just coincidentally is shared by virtually nobody and it just so
happens that this arbitrary definiton matches exactly your software
which you wish to call 'open source' for PR reasons.