4 Dec
2004
4 Dec
'04
3:20 p.m.
On Fri, 2004-03-12 at 23:58 -0700, Doug Wellington wrote:
Previously:
The purpose, if you actually READ the f****** thing, was to stop the
useless flaming in this thread. Which, for the record, is the ONLY
thing YOU have contributed at all.
Obviously more subtle suggestions aren't effective with you, so I'll be
more to the point:
Shut up. Control that trollish urge to hit the reply button and call me
nasty names, and just don't (I won't reply anyway). Thank you.
-DR- (who is officially done feeding the troll)
I'm not even going to justify that with a
response - you're putting
so many words into my mouth it's ridiculous.
<quotes>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:42:44 -0500
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer
We hardly have any right to complain if we
don't even express
distaste with their newfound fascist strategy.
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:57:11 -0500
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer
There are very valid technical reasons why a
closed piece of hardware is
a POS from a Linux user's perspective.
</quotes>
And the implicit meanings of those two quotes are?
Anyway, read the email you're replying to
again, note it's purpose, and
decide if replying as you did was really a good idea. Enough. Please.
Can you help me by clarifying "it's purpose" [sic]...? Maybe I've got
it all wrong - I thought you were just bitching because RME didn't give you something
you wanted and you were trying to rally the LAD troops to create a big stink to try to get
RME to give it to you... ;-)