11 Sep
2018
11 Sep
'18
12:34 p.m.
On 2018-09-10 19:32:52 (-0400), Mark D. McCurry wrote:
On 09-09, Christopher Arndt wrote:
I guess a good first starting point is to
contact the former maintainers
and get them involved (and to notify them about the website status -
maybe it needs a new home?).
Guess it would also be nice to find out what the motivations behind
abandoning 1.1 were.
Best,
David
--
https://sleepmap.de
I'd definitely be interested in helping OSC
staying relevant.
I don't have much time to contribute at this point, though it would be
great to know that some effort is being put into at least maintaining
the existing information on the standard as well as what implementation
are available for applications to use.