27 Apr
2005
27 Apr
'05
12:19 p.m.
On Wednesday 27 April 2005 15:44, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 02:12:29PM +0100, Julian
Storer wrote:
Thats the difference between the copyright (as in copy) and the ownership.
This is clearly parted in the german law at least and called Urheberrecht vs.
Verwertungsrechte. Since you are the one who wrote the code, you are the one
who can sell it / license it to whoever you want, GPL and not-GPL. The one
who gets licensed code from you must obey to the license you sold it under.
If you decide to sell/give your code to someone for business use you are
still allowed to "sell" your own code under the GPL for public use.
But, I am not a laywer, I just have a dad who works in arts and has to deal
with ownership vs. licensing/copyrights.
Arnold
--
There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly what the
Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be
replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened.
-- Douglas Adams, The Restaurant at the End of the Universe
if you own the copyright to something, you can
release it under as many
licenses as you like..
I'm not an expert on this, and can only assume
you're right about that.
Q. Suppose I write something and transfer copyright to you, as
required for your project. Can I then still release the same code
under the GPL ? I'd guess not, since I gave up my rights to it.
That would probably stop me from contributing...