4 Feb
2003
4 Feb
'03
8:55 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 07:10:39 -0500, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
I'd say that AMS, SSM, pd and ecasound mark it as a success :)
I dont see how nayone could dismiss JACK in this respect, it does one thing
(lowlatency synced audio for music creation apps) and it does it very well.
- Steve
Despite that I strongly think that an audio
server that not permit in
native way the traditional approach (what you call blocking approach)
will never achieve the driving role we'd need.
Well, given that Ardour, amsynth, alsaplayer, and freqtweak all use jack,
I'm pretty happy with how it is. It doesn't need to gain any more
applications to be considered a success as far as I'm concerned.