21 Nov
2009
21 Nov
'09
7:13 a.m.
On 11/21/2009 05:18 AM, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
One major item of note is that qjackctl now has preliminary dbus support
even though Rui has stated that it would not happen. This step in itself
should be clear a major roadblock to LADI integration and deployment.
wait, i don't seem to remember having said it would *not* happen. i
think i had said it would be *hard* to happen, mainly due to my
everlasting lack of time. you all know the stance ;)
and moving on a bit (but staying in the same place):
i think a also made my position long ago that qjackctl is a jack control
application and thus, it should harness the jack control api and nothing
else on the side. imo, it's this jack control api or protocol that
should be implemented through whatever ipc mechanism you think of (dbus,
osc, yada yada).
ok, in that sense, you can say that qackctl would not go the jack dbus
route, at least directly face to face. again imo, it must do it on top a
an established jack control interface. no more no less ;)
cheers
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org