On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:53:10 +0200, Alfons
Adriaensen wrote:
If the only
approval process is the intervention of a "benevolent
dictator", then one would at least expect for this person to take up
his responsabilities, take part in the discussion, and decide.
If this, for some reason, is not possible then another approval
process should be installed.
I can't see how that, or any other process, would agree on any of the
proposed fixes given the current lack of concensus.
The advantage of having a real dictator is that no concensus is needed :-)
--
Fons