9 Dec
2002
9 Dec
'02
2:29 p.m.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
BAPULDAL - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API Backwards.
--
Tim Hockin wrote:
Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API.
> Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would
be so complicated that an
> instrument API must not support it?
Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
that LADSPA will still be simpler.
yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.