5 Aug
2008
5 Aug
'08
1:18 p.m.
Fons Adriaensen wrote:
ahem, A water molecule is two parts hydrogen and one part oxygen.
Therefore separating the parts gives us two whole hydrogen atoms to
excite and extract energy from. I have read that Hydrogen is
approximately 10 times more unstable than gasoline and therefore you
need less of it to create the same amount of explosive force.
So how is this different from a car motor that runs on gasoline?
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:01:55PM +0700, Patrick
Shirkey wrote:
Not once we melt the arctic and the antarctic. Then we will have lot's
of extra water all round ;-)
Anyway I don't see this issue as I live in a tropical part of the world
and have a big river 10 minutes walk away. Also the Ocean is only 2
hours drive away.
In most places water is fairly easy to come by as
you only have to wait
for the rain or go to a lake/ocean whereas electricity is slightly more
complex to attain and usually requires payment for the privilege.
Are we living on the same planet ? In most places water supply will
become as big a problem as petrol supply.
If you can
burn water directly without having to extract the hydrogen
first
But you can't since it is already 'burned'. It's the 'ashes'
of burning hydrogen.
once you start
the car you will be providing enough energy
to keep the engine running
Aaaaarrrrrggggghhhhhh ! The perpetuum mobile
again....
What sort of waste does this produce ? Water ? Any
different from the one you have to put in ?
Not as far as I know but it doesn't recycle every millilitre so there is
eventual need to top up the reserves.
--
Patrick Shirkey
Boost Hardware Ltd.