4 Dec
2004
4 Dec
'04
3 a.m.
Previously:
I'm not even going to justify that with a response
- you're putting
so many words into my mouth it's ridiculous.
<quotes>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:42:44 -0500
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer
We hardly have any right to complain if we don't
even express
distaste with their newfound fascist strategy.
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 11:57:11 -0500
From: Dave Robillard <drobilla(a)connect.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Behringer
There are very valid technical reasons why a closed
piece of hardware is
a POS from a Linux user's perspective.
</quotes>
And the implicit meanings of those two quotes are?
Anyway, read the email you're replying to again,
note it's purpose, and
decide if replying as you did was really a good idea. Enough. Please.
Can you help me by clarifying "it's purpose" [sic]...? Maybe I've got
it all wrong - I thought you were just bitching because RME didn't give you something
you wanted and you were trying to rally the LAD troops to create a big stink to try to get
RME to give it to you... ;-)
The question is not "why limit yourself". I
am not limiting myself.
RME is limiting me. (In a way. Don't go there)
"Don't go there"? If you don't want me or anyone else to go there, why
bother bringing it up in the first place? Are you trying to be a martyr?
-Doug