20 Oct
2002
20 Oct
'02
6:56 p.m.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2002 at 02:50:19 -0400, David Gerard Matthews wrote:
This might be true on the macro scale, "what we need is a complete DAW
that does everything" ;) but I, personally have no idea what the average
musician wants from plugins. My needs are pretty esoteric, and I'm trying
not to flood the LADSPA scene with bizarre, special purpose plugins (belive
it or not ;).
Which brings me to my off-topic rant, I think its my turn again ;)
Don't be afraid to criticise. I am very thick skinned, and wont be
offended if you tell me that plugin X is crap, or should be different. Or
something. Complain! Just because you're not paying me doesn't mean I
don't care if it sucks.
I have a bigish todo list, but some of the things on it are truly hard,
however if what you want is easy, it will get done quickly, and if enough
people want something I will be more motivated to pull my finger out.
</rant>
- Steve
I think that
some real program management is required.
Look at what the market wants and needs, (audio, MIDI, soft synths,
plugins,
scoring, automation, etc.) write it down somewhere and then do an honest
assessment of where Linux audio solutions are.
I don't think lack of awareness is the problem. The problem is that
most Linux audio apps are developed by
people who have full-time jobs doing other things. The problems
involved in designing audio apps are so great
that even those people who are able to work full time on Linux audio are
often stupmed as to how to implement