24 Jan
2008
24 Jan
'08
4:34 a.m.
On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 04:54 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov wrote:
Bob Ham <rah(a)bash.sh> writes:
I'm not sure what the point of posting this function is. It doesn't
contradict anything I said.
Bob
--
Bob Ham <rah(a)bash.sh>
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 21:11 +0200, Nedko Arnaudov
wrote:
static void *
jack_watchdog_thread (void *arg)
{ Bob Ham <rah(a)bash.sh> writes:
A good example. What does the watchdog do, exactly? It isn't a
frontend. I doesn't try to work around jackd's crashing. It just
ensures that if something bad does happen, the computer as a whole isn't
brought down. This is massively different from what you're proposing.
To try and work around a crash in jackd and present a system to the user
where crashes make no difference is to invite more problems. If you
can't get jackd to stay up, what makes you think you can get your new
system to stay up? More generally, LASH isn't a frontend for
JACK.
What about the jack watchdog? What does get killed by it?