On 08/09/2009 08:12 PM, Kjetil S. Matheussen wrote:
Patrick Shirkey:
> On 08/08/2009 09:57 PM, Jens M Andreasen wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 16:44 +1000, Patrick Shirkey wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Here's what I have found after extensive testing with the latest dev
>>> version of pulseaudio-v0.9.16-4 and jack-0.116.1 on a 2 core amd, 4GB
>>> notebook running Fedora 11.
>>>
>>> 1. 32 bit apps will not play on a 64 bit pulseaudio easily or at all.
>>> 2. Skype, Realplayer/Helix and Flash are a pain to get working with
>>> pulseaudio if they work at all.
>>>
>>>
>> These two items are related, right? Does it go away with a
>> 32bit/extended kernel?
>>
>>
>>
> I haven't tested with a 32 bit system. I'm not sure if I will get the
> time for that. I don't think in this case it has much to do with the
> kernel. I think it is because pulse is compiled for 64 bit and the apps
> are looking for 32 bit libs.
>
>
Well, there's your problem. It's great that you try out new
software though, but of course then you'll get more stability
issues as well.
To clarify, I have found that is difficult to get 32 bit apps to connect
to a 64 bit build of pulseaudio but these apps don't cause stability
issues with pulse. The problem is they just don't connect. I can still run
them directly over the alsa layer but that locks the device in a standard
Fedora 11 setup. I believe this would affect alot of "normal" users so I
would like to find a workable solution that can be recommended to all
packagers as a LAD standard.
No, as I said, the solution is very simple: Don't install a 64 bit OS.
That's what's causing your problems, apparently.