9 Dec
2002
9 Dec
'02
2:25 p.m.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Joern Nettingsmeier wrote:
Tim Hockin wrote:
yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API.
--
Why? What
is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
instrument API must not support it?
Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
that LADSPA will still be simpler.