11 Dec
2002
11 Dec
'02
9:09 a.m.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 12:09:58 +0000, Steve Harris wrote
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:47:50 +0100, Dave Griffiths
wrote:
I'd like to avoid having a global polyphony for ssm really. It's a bit more
flexible if you can set different levels of polyphony for different
subpatches, and more cpu friendly too.
If anyone is interested BTW, there is a new version of ssm availible at
sourceforge at the moment, which along with a lot of other new stuff, has a
LADSPA GUI generator (thanks to Mike Rawes):
http://sourceforge.net/projects/spiralmodular
dave
It also means getting midi signal routing
working, as currently ssm has no
polyphonic means of note signalling, but it's fairly trivial. The only thing
is that it will break the everything plugs into anything rule :(
It shouldn't have to. There are plenty of polyphonic modular
implementations that still just have audio and control data.