26 Mar
2011
26 Mar
'11
10:02 p.m.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 2:50 PM, torbenh <torbenh(a)gmx.de> wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 04:45:51PM +0100, Lieven Moors
wrote:
i didn't interpret his question as meaning that, but yeah, OK.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your reply.
I'm not sure my program would satisfy the realtime constraint.
But I'll have a look at both options again...
using the sync callback to detect a skip in the transport is
not adequate usage of it.