26 Jul
2009
26 Jul
'09
9:02 a.m.
Sampo this is not true.
The license is in every source file:
This Java Class is part of the jMusic API version 1.5, March 2004.>
Copyright (C) 2000 Andrew Sorensen & Andrew Brown
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or any
later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Yep. That makes a lot of sense. Is the jmusic in
question this one
http://jmusic.ci.qut.edu.au/ ?
It seems this software is treading deep in unlicensed waters. I can't
find any notion of the license under which jmusic is distributed. If one
googles the site for "license" (http://www.google.com/search?q=site%
3Ajmusic.ci.qut.edu.au+license ) you can find three hits, all about GPL
on _examples_ using jmusic. The source distribution of jmusic has no
licensing information at all. They might be in violation of sourceforges
user agreements.
Jeeze. This makes one wonder how people are not more careful about how
they release their work?
Sampo
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev