16 Feb
2013
16 Feb
'13
11:38 a.m.
________________________________
De : Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <pedro.lopez.cabanillas(a)gmail.com>
À : M Donalies <ingeniousnebbish(a)cox.net>
Cc : linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
Envoyé le : Samedi 16 février 2013 11h02
Objet : Re: [LAD] making sense of Jack MIDI; or, is this an appropriate use for Jack?
On Friday 15 February 2013 18:41:11 M Donalies wrote:
Frankly I don't understand why you guys always take the occasion of such threads (that
are purely technically motivated by someone asking for advice) to digg out your old
disputes. Why can't you just accept that any concept that came up here has their pros
and cons? I didn't see any dictator-like behavior in any of the previous arguments. If
you don't like it noone obliges you to use jack or Qt or ALSA ;) and it's good
that way no?
Neither of the two MIDI APIs has evolved much in the last years, and I think that is the
only thing to admit here
Best
Frank
I suppose I've been spoiled by the Qt
documentation.
He and his followers don't profess great respect for Qt. The arrogance of youth, I
guess.