26 Jan
2010
26 Jan
'10
4:08 a.m.
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 01:57:05 drew Roberts wrote:
On Monday 25 January 2010 17:59:36 Gabriel M.
Beddingfield wrote:
I tell you guys, 21 is only half the answer...
he return is
guaranteed be the most random number you could
imagine.
I think you can get this by a simple call to rnd.i()
Now, if you want to make your randomness complex rather than imaginary...