21 Sep
2002
21 Sep
'02
11:37 a.m.
Hi,
I did mention this in passing sometime in july if I remember, and am
still interested and am intending such an undertaking. Collaboration
would be good, and I did start drawing up a plug-in interface which is
working, but my goal was for a clean C++ interface. In this day and age,
it makes much more sense (especially for ease of programming GUIs).
Still interested in collaborating?
-Nick d-.-b
On Sat, 2002-09-21 at 13:11, mimo wrote:
Hi,
I haven't looked at the latest versions of Fruity for a while but started
working on something that is quite similiar to your description in the
beginning of this year. I have now reached a certain level where the core
signaling engine becomes usable.
I don't know if you have ever worked with buzz but I consider some sort of UI
quite similiar to its.
How does this sound to you?
mm
On Wednesday 04 September 2002 8:08 am, Tim Hockin wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
I know someone on here once posted about doing a
FruityLoops work-alike
app. Are you still around?
I have been tossing about this idea for a free, high quality,
well-architected, virtual studio for a while. If I had a collaborator or
two, I'd probably be more inclined to do it.
Anyone? My thoughts so far:
* a plugin API like LADSPA but less 'S'
* a modular-synth core engine
* layered control - modular synth, or a Fruity-like interface on top
* written in C
* clean code, modular, extensible, blah blah...
There is a ton of code waiting to be borrowed. Whole portions may not need
to be written. I haven't investigated THAT far yet.
Tim
_______________________________________________
linux-audio-dev mailing list
linux-audio-dev(a)music.columbia.edu
http://music.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev