4 Oct
2002
4 Oct
'02
7:47 p.m.
On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 01:22:47 +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
This might be a good addition. In any case using pids
is not optimal.
This is basicly the same problem as with port names. Either we maintain
two sets of names (one for programs, one for the user-interfaces) or
make a compromise and have something that is usable for both. Requiring
users to map the application instances to pids does not fill this
requirement.
I hadn't thought about having two names. That wouldn;t totaly solve the
borblem though, as youd still want unique, easy to read names for the long
name.
- Steve