Re: [LAD] For your information

To all, for your information. I have received the following message from Mr. Nick Copeland. It was sent privately, but since this is the continuation of a thread on this list and the person concerned has well gone beyond any reasonable limits of decent behaviour I feel free to post it here.

*** Start included message *** The last time I looked at the AMS source code I was under the impression that the Moog VCF filters were not actually yours, they were Tossavainen and Kellets. They were published eventually placed on musicdsp.org however there are a couple of things here: 1. In their original publishing they did not advocate the use of quantisation of their parameters - you implemented this as an adaptation of their algorithm. 2. In not quoting the original authors you are plagiarism them. In the source to AMS they are quoted however it is bit disingenious to imply that this was 'your' MoogVCF. In short you did not actually write the 'Moog' VCF parts and suggesting that this is how their algorithms worked is just attempting to justify quantisation to 1/16 is not deleterious to quality which is definitely not attributable to the original authors. arrogant selfpublicist however base on the claims in your email you are actually a lying plagiarst. Regards nick. *** End included message *** -- FA O tu, che porte, correndo si ? E guerra e morte ! _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev