PulseAudio is not a part of the signal flow of any pro-audio workflow.
That said, its control applications that adjust the hardware mixer work in
just the same way that any other hardware mixer application does, so if you
like it, there's no reason not to use it.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:30 AM, Philip Rhoades <phil(a)pricom.com.au> wrote:
People,
I am not a professional LA user but I have regard for what serious LA
users have to say. A post turned up on the Fedora XFCE list about removing
xfce4-mixer for F29 - I responded with:
"Every time I upgrade I immediately UNinstall PA and use ALSA only - so I
still depend on xfce4-mixer . ."
Someone replied that PA has greatly improved since the early days
especially and "controlling streams separately is an added feature" - but I
can do that with the .asoundrc I have now - are there any good reasons for
me to reconsider the situation the next time I do a fresh install? (I
realise I am likely to get biased comments here but I am not going to post
on a PA list . .).
Thanks,
Phil.
--
Philip Rhoades
PO Box 896
Cowra NSW 2794
Australia
E-mail: phil(a)pricom.com.au
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev