28 Jun
2005
28 Jun
'05
1:36 p.m.
On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:16:15 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
[Christoph Eckert]
Thats one point of view, but actually the LADSPA API is still pretty
cleen, in the grand scheme of things. Though it could be better of
course.
- Steve
I enjoy jack-rack with some EQ, chorus and reverb
really a
great fun when plugging in my acoustic guitar.
LADSPAS in ardour are really cool as well as using LADSPAS in
synths like ams or om directly (and om does use them
excessively).
I agree that the GUI interfaces for LADSPAs are sometimes
suboptimal, but this is due to the name of LAD_S_PAs.
Yes, simple is nice. However, the API's excessive verbosity and the
1.1 kludges sometimes tempt me to expand the S into other, more
pejorative words.