On Tuesday 15 December 2009 15:36:04 Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote:
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009, Paul Davis wrote:
why not use glib? as some folk like to say:
"even Qt does these days" :)
True... but I'm just trying to avoid a
"dependency creep"
(which becomes a bigger issue when porting to Windows).
No glib hate. I just don't want to add a dependency to glib
so that I can use a single class template.
But when its a template, why not include that header in your project?
The original shouldn't change that much that it qualifies as a "must have
external dependency"?
Arnold