21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
10:02 p.m.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Lieven Moors <lievenmoors(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 03:29:40PM -0500, Paul Davis
wrote:
That would be me ;-)
I probably did this because I thought it could change at period
boundaries. Could you explain why it is wrong?
it cannot change. if we ever implemented a way for it to change and you
care, you should have a sample rate callback installed. otherwise, check it
after you connect to the server and forget anything else.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Lieven Moors
<lievenmoors(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Aren't most clients checking for
the sample rate in the process callback anyway?
if they are, then they are doing it wrong.