15 Mar
2010
15 Mar
'10
7:16 p.m.
I will check out the latest version of SL, but the problem I have with SL is
that
1. It doesn't load samples over 10Mb
2. It never displays a file name of a loaded loop, so as the number of open
loops grows, you forget which one is which
3. SL was done with very different usage in mind. That shows in almost every
feature it has, they way it is done.
Also, what's simple programming for you, the devs, is a very difficult
puzzle for a non-programmer. I just learned to compile
from source properly ;)
Cheers!
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Olivier <pianolivier(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I would want to be able to assign midi
control to triggering loops, volume and panning -
at least that.
Otherwise,
Kluppe is very difficult to use in a live performance.
However, instead of proposing to allow to create separate controls for
each
looper like they have in SooperLooper, I would advice (and actually, ask
for
this feature to be implemented in such a manner) to instead go for the
Selected looper scheme. So that one would not need a dozen of knobs to
control things. There should be an ability to have one "Selected" looper.
sooperlooper allready has this feature, look for the latest releases.
simple MIDI programming with bash/mididings, pd or csound could easily add
the "random" feature to it
olivier
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev