21 Oct
2003
21 Oct
'03
4:46 p.m.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 01:16:52PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
The latter. If you read the whole thing, it's pretty clear even from that
link that "tailored to fit the needs of the Digidesign end user"
means nothing more than "it's a versatile microphone".
--
Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
Look! Up in the sky! It's FRAGILE MAN BLOWER!
(random hero from isometric.spaceninja.com)
Paul Davis
wrote:
hey paul, how about getting neumann to sell their large diaphragms
bundled with an ardour live evaluation cd ?
beat digidesign where it hurts most: in the packaging >;->
i said it was drivel because it is. i don't do drivel. whether or not
its a nice mic (and i have no idea), the idea of a mic designed to
work with a particular set of digital hardware goes against everything
that pro audio is supposed to be about. if their hardware is so good,
it shouldn't need or benefit from a tweaked mic. if the mic isn't
tweaked, then its nothing but marketing. drivel.