On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 02:46:37 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
Let's just
standardize an extension for latency ports after the release
of LV2. And let's do it FAST, so that most plugin writers will be
porting their plugins with the extension in place.
I think this should be included in the spec, since it's devastating when
plugins don't adhere. I believe Steve agrees with me (Steve?)
It doesnt need to be an extension really, as it was common practice in
LADSPA, just pick a URI for the hint and put it in the schema.
lv2:latencySamples anyone?
- Steve