On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 11:32 am, Tim Goetze wrote:
hmm. agreed of course about the complicated
alternatives. i wasn't
aware that a separate plugin GUI becomes nigh mandatory, which i
must admit i find not to my greatest liking.
Only if you actually need the configure() stuff, which many plugins
might not. But I agree it's not exactly ideal. Better ideas
welcome.
i'm not too intimate with liblo/OSC, so sorry for
asking an RTFM
question: does OSC provide some sort of alternative, textual
representation of configuration options?
I don't think OSC knows anything about "configuration" as such, it's
just a delivery mechanism for passing typed arguments to named
methods. Steve's really the OSC nut though: I'm just happy that it's
reasonably simple and it works.
Chris