3 Feb
2003
3 Feb
'03
11:50 a.m.
On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 04:12:19 +0200, Sami P Perttu wrote:
I think this is bad. There should be just one
process() function, which
could be given two gain values, one for previous output and another for
the plugin's own output. Plugins would do
out[i] = previous_gain * out[i] + gain * myoutput;
David is about to say non-mixing process() is a performance hack ;), but
allways using this adds too much cost to fast plugins.
- Steve