8 Dec
2002
8 Dec
'02
6:01 a.m.
Tim Hockin wrote:
yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name - open to
ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier
Kurfürstenstr 49, 45138 Essen, Germany
http://spunk.dnsalias.org (my server)
http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/ (Linux Audio Developers)
Why? What
is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated that an
instrument API must not support it?
Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that implies
that LADSPA will still be simpler.