-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
re all,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 08:49:40PM +0200, Arnold Krille wrote:
Actually the most free software development happens
in a Do-cracy:
The one who does the job (or the biggest part of it) gets to decide.
that's right. but sometimes people gain a better position to do things
and avoid including other "doers" treathening their "power". it
can
happen in projects growing succesful, that get funding (yes, money can
harm a project) and don't have an "open organization" protocol (i'm
loosely referring to
http://www.open-organizations.org) for these
kinds of negotiations.
So if Bob titles himself as "Director",
that is fine. He actually
directs the output of various students into a releasable form that
lasts longer then a summer.
i agree that is fine, plus he seems to invest good care in documenting
students contributions.
still, myself being a person working in education, i think the problem
is more structural: i'd rather question why students in a school
should be contributing to a professor's project, rather than starting
one on their own? they could learn how to work in a more horizontal
and creative way, even if the project will be less interesting in the
eyes of the director, who should be there to give suggestions and help
on students projects, not the contrary.
ciao
- --
jaromil,
dyne.org developer,
http://jaromil.dyne.org
GPG: 779F E8B5 47C7 3A89 4112 64D0 7B64 3184 B534 0B5E
Nowadays only soubrettes, body builders, media owners and "the
richest bozo in the pond" tend to be elected by a population of
zombified slaves happy to run inside their guinea pig wheels
Fravia, April 2009,
http://fravia.com/swansong.htm
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkp5X/UACgkQe2QxhLU0C15dRQCgqNN+jw50E/eyDRGQW09gpFaE
rwgAn0uR/cLvAzF7t+17ZHFl2wrkuEFB
=SGW1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----