25 Jan
2008
25 Jan
'08
11:21 a.m.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 09:15:35PM +0100, Esben Stien wrote:
But that's really the funny thing here. Your
software isn't from the
free/open source software communities. It doesn't conform to neither
the free software definition nor the open source definition.
I'm glad that GPLv3 fixes this issue, cause if you state that the
software is under GPLv3 you may not impose any further restrictions on
the work, if I read the license correctly.
Dio mio. Why does this remind me of Revolutionary Guards
rhetoric from the Cultural Revolution era (People's
Republic of China, mid 1960s) ?
I suggest you force Christian to declare his sins in public,
and after that he should be sent to at least 10 years of hard
labour on a collective FOSS farm.
Ciao,
--
FA
Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica
Parma, Italia
Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa.