4 Dec
2017
4 Dec
'17
1:12 p.m.
I am very serious, Neil. I am glad that your personal experience is
different. You were able to build a system that works well for you. As a
person who works a lot with multimedia, I can tell you that a proprietary
video editor will be in most cases much more stable than a floss one. And
why shouldn't it? Teams are working on it 40 hours every week, all year
round.
Nothing in the concept of FLOSS promises floss software to actually be more
high quality or more stable. All it guarantees is that you can distribute
it and modify. So why would it magically be more stable than proprietary?
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Neil C Smith <neilcsmith.net(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM Louigi Verona <louigi.verona(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
--
Louigi Verona
https://www.patreon.com/droning
https://louigiverona.com/
And in my experience, proprietary systems are
generally much more stable
than floss, and are less likely to fail suddenly and without warning.
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .... oh, wait .. you're serious?! ;-)
There's a reason I use FLOSS, and it's because my personal experience is
absolutely the opposite of this.
Best wishes,
Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net
Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org