13 Apr
2011
13 Apr
'11
2:13 p.m.
On 04/13/2011 01:00 PM, James Morris wrote:
On 13 April 2011 12:44, James
Morris<jwm.art.net(a)gmail.com> wrote:
theoretically yes but murphy may have a different opinion ;)
byee
--
rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela
rncbc(a)rncbc.org
On 13 April 2011 12:42, Rui Nuno
Capela<rncbc(a)rncbc.org> wrote:
...
The ARCH qjackctl package needs to be rebuilt against the newer JACK
then... ? The release date of the ARCH package is a couple of days
after the release of the recent QjackCtl. Will QjackCTL cope if it was
built with JACK Session support (on machine x) but running (on machine
y) against a JACK without session support?
please read your qjackctl/about box whether
there's a "JACK Session support
disabled" written in red. that should say it all
Yeah, that says it all :/ Doh. Thanks.