1 Jul
2014
1 Jul
'14
12:45 p.m.
Am 01.07.2014 12:41, schrieb hermann meyer:
Am 01.07.2014 12:16, schrieb Fons Adriaensen:
And truly, it could generate native C++ code, not deactivated from faust
code.
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 09:24:43AM +0200, hermann
meyer wrote:
Haven't say that, nor suggest that. It's just a example, It is just a
other way to go.
And, let me tell you, this way is full of fun.
Have I mention that the toolkit surly include a interface to plot the
results and beside faust code, it could compile ready to run Lv2 and
Gxplugins?
As a example, we have the jcm800pre, a GCB95 and
a baxandall tone
control simulation as plugin in guitarix, generated with this
toolkit.
Do you really believe that a Baxandall tone control is in any
way different from the combination of a standard first order
LF and an HF 'shelf' equaliser ?
Well, it isn't, the two are mathematically equivalent.
The Baxandall circuit is just a very convenient way to realise such
filters in analog HW. Its main advantage is that it will provide
symmetrical (in dB) EQ curves having a decent control law, while
still using standard linear pots, and that it is fairly tolerant
of typical component errors. That's all there is to it, it doesn't
sound different from any first order shelf filter.
Any suggestion that the digital emulation of such a circuit would
be 'better' than standard digital filters is nonsense and pure
snake oil.
However, this list here is the wrong place to discus
that any further,
I just hope that some people here get interested in such a approve
(Tim you are more then welcome to join us),
if, please join us at
guitarix-developer(a)lists.sourceforge.net
to discus and eventually help us to get it going.
regards
hermann
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev