12 Nov
2002
12 Nov
'02
11:30 a.m.
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 16:45:04 +0100 (CET), Tim Goetze wrote:
Mark,
Paul Davis wrote:
...
i assume paul knows what he's talking about, and i agree
completely to his opinion.
I'll second that. I have copies of both patents. I've read them but
Paul seems to have a much better handle on what thier claims are. If
you are still interested contact me and I'll try to eek out some time
to re-read and list the specific claims.
I haven't compared the differences between the first patent and the
second one (which is a re-issue of the first one) but it seems to
just add some more generic claims.
--
Richard A. Smith Bitworks, Inc.
rsmith(a)bitworks.com 479.846.5777 x104
Sr. Design Engineer http://www.bitworks.com
It
isn't my intention to flame you, but has anyone here actually read and
studied the patent? Have you? I haven't. Someone said they had a copy? Let's
hear a listing of what the actual patent claims are before we create a
defense.
i've read the patent.