29 Apr
2010
29 Apr
'10
5:41 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:45 PM, michael noble <looplog(a)gmail.com> wrote:
A/D -> Rakarrack -> Jackrack -> Ardour -> D/A
this is not the diagram that people are referring to. latency is an issue
when you have:
A/D -> Ardour -> Rakarrack -> Ardour -> D/A
i.e. Rakarrack as an insert for an ardour track or bus.
would have no less than four multiples of the internal JACK latency. This
would quickly become unworkable in more complex JACK
graphs (for example
asymmetrical graphs would have signal chains running with different internal
latencies). This would make having application interconnects a pointless
exercise in frustration for the most part. And actually, from experience,
this is not what seems to happen at all.
its not a pointless exercise in frustration because this kind of
connectivity (A feeds B which feeds A) is useful but not as common as the
more simple (A feeds B feeds C).
there have been some suggestions to allow/encourage applications to have
multiple clients precisely to permit the A->B->A ("insert") processing to
work with no extra latency.