16 Jan
2004
16 Jan
'04
10:19 p.m.
Steve Harris wrote:
Can we wait until the 1.2 pending changes go through -
I think there
more important and I dont want them to get tangled up in the this.
is there a draft/diff for LADSPA 1.2 i could have a look at? i have no
idea what the changes will be (have been off l-a-d for most of 2003)
and would like to find out.
Not all the stakeholders have agreed that disconnected
ports are
LADSPA-y enough yet either.
nothing of an important stakeholder here, but to me hinting
'accept-null-pointer' per port sounds ok, provided we have enough
spare hint bits.
tim