7 Jan
2003
7 Jan
'03
9:09 a.m.
On Tuesday 07 January 2003 10.28, Steve Harris wrote:
[...]
Well, they *are* special in that they're latched only at certain
points. The problem is that if synths cannot effectively *implement*
it that way, it becomes the host's/sender's responsibility to know
the difference, and make sure that these controls are handled the
right way. And unless the host/sender can tell the synth exactly when
to latch the values, there is no way to get this right.
What I'm saying is that synths should preferably behave is if *all*
voice controls ever received are tracked on a per-VVID basis, so they
can be latched as intended when the synth decides to start a physical
voice. That way, you can play continous control data on latched
control synths and vice versa, without nasty side effects or "smart"
event processing in the host/sender.
Obviously, this just isn't possible if the number of VVIDs used to
control a synth is unknown or very large. However, I don't see a
reason why you would use many more VVIDs than there are physical
voices, so I don't see this as a real problem.
Synths that don't allocate physical voices as soon as a VVID gets
it's first control may have to allocate virtual voices upon
connection, but I think that's acceptable, considering the
alternatives.
//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate
.- The Return of Audiality! --------------------------------.
| Free/Open Source Audio Engine for use in Games or Studio. |
| RT and off-line synth. Scripting. Sample accurate timing. |
`---------------------------> http://olofson.net/audiality -'
--- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---
This is also
for debate - David dislikes (and I agree) the notion
that you have to send a note-on but the plugin does not have
enough info to handle (for example) a velocity-mapped sampler
until later. Process events in order. So a few ideas are on the
table.
You do have enough infomation, its just that it may be superseded
later. Velocity can have a default.
ONe great thing about this scheme is that it encourages people not
to think of certain, arbitary parameters as instantiation
parameters, withc are special in some way, 'cos there not.